The Unsung Guardians: How Financial Advisers Protect Communities from Fraud

In the evolving financial advice landscape, regulatory reforms have consistently aimed to elevate professional standards and eliminate misconduct. However, a groundbreaking study published in the British Accounting Review reveals an unexpected consequence of these well-intentioned changes: as financial advisers exit the industry en masse, the communities they once served become increasingly vulnerable to financial fraud and scams.

The research paper, aptly titled "Unsung guardians? Communal fraud susceptibility and complaints following mass financial adviser attrition," provides compelling evidence that financial advisers serve a broader social purpose beyond their direct client relationships, functioning as protective guardians against financial misconduct in their wider communities.

A Natural Experiment in Adviser Attrition

The research by Oh, Parwada, and Wang from the University of New South Wales Business School capitalises on a unique quasi-experimental setting created by Australia's implementation of heightened educational and ethics requirements through the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) in 2019. These reforms triggered unprecedented attrition in the financial planning industry, with adviser numbers declining from a peak of more than 28,000 in 2018 to nearly half at its low point in 2024.

"We exploit this quasi-experimental setting of mass exits from the wealth management industry to show the removal of professional financial advice increases fraud in affected localities," the authors explain in their abstract.

Using a difference-in-differences methodology, the researchers analysed local government areas (LGAs) across Australia, comparing those with above-median adviser attrition rates to those with lower attrition. Their findings were striking: areas with higher adviser attrition experienced approximately 8.8% more fraud incidents than comparable areas with less adviser departure.

This effect remained consistent across various robustness checks, including different definitions of affected areas, demographic covariates, and exclusion of central business districts with disproportionately high adviser concentrations.

Knowledge Diffusion as Community Protection

What explains this protective effect of financial advisers? The researchers hypothesise two key mechanisms that may contribute to reduced fraud susceptibility:

1. Knowledge diffusion: Clients who receive professional financial advice internalise sound investment principles and share this expertise with family, friends, and associates in their community. This creates a ripple effect of financial literacy that extends beyond the adviser's direct clientele.
2. Fraud deterrence: A higher concentration of advisers may discourage potential fraudsters from targeting an area, as residents have easier access to professional advice to help them identify suspicious schemes.

The research draws on established theories of social learning and financial behaviour, particularly the notion that individuals tend to live near their close associates, facilitating the spread of financial expertise from advised to non-advised community members.

"Adviser departures may reduce the influence of a grounded investing approach, providing opportunities for the proliferation of lucrative albeit fraudulent schemes and higher take-ups by residents," the authors note.

The Economics of Crime and Financial Expertise

The theoretical foundation for the study rests in the economics of crime literature initiated by Nobel laureate Gary Becker, which suggests perpetrators respond to opportunities and incentives to commit crimes. Financial advisers, the researchers argue, don't merely channel clients toward investments; they cultivate a loss-aversion mindset that favours safe, reputable financial products.

This conservative approach to investing spreads through social networks, creating communities more capable of recognising potentially fraudulent schemes that promise unrealistic returns. This protective influence diminishes when advisers depart an area, creating opportunities for scammers.

The researchers collected extensive data on fraud incidents from state police records, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, and self-reported victim accounts through IDCARE, a national identity and cyber support service. This comprehensive approach captured both criminal financial fraud and non-criminal exposures such as excessive fees or unauthorised account withdrawals.

Not All Adviser Characteristics Created Equal

The study further investigates which adviser characteristics most effectively reduce community fraud vulnerability. Interestingly, higher education levels among advisers—a significant focus of the FASEA reforms—did not significantly impact fraud rates. However, areas with higher proportions of advisers affiliated with professional associations experienced approximately 11% less fraud.

This finding suggests that ethics training, commonly required by professional bodies like the Financial Advice Association of Australia and the professional communities of best practice they support, may be more effective than just formal education in reducing adviser misconduct and enhancing their protective influence on communities.

"The outcomes suggest FASEA's requirements for additional ethics instruction improve adviser performance, given that professional associations often internally mandate members to undergo similar training," the researchers observe.

The findings also indicated that the gender composition of advisers did not significantly affect fraud prevalence, despite literature suggesting gender differences in corporate executives' communication abilities and likelihood to commit fraud.

Policy Implications and Industry Challenges

The research presents a challenging dilemma for policymakers. While regulatory reforms aim to improve adviser quality and reduce misconduct, they may inadvertently increase community vulnerability to fraud since they triggered substantial adviser attrition.

"From a broader perspective, the loss of community protection becomes an additional problem based upon existing issues surrounding adviser attrition. These include the lack of advisers to service large wealth transfers from older to younger generations and an increasing population of retirees," the authors note.

This highlights the urgent need for the government, regulators, and licensees to prioritise implementing the Quality of Advice Review recommendations immediately. By cutting through regulatory red tape, we can greatly improve consumer access to the essential protection that professional advice provides.

The study also revealed that community trust significantly reduces fraud incidence. At the same time, areas with higher percentages of non-English speakers showed increased financial fraud and complaints to AFCA about investment fraud. This suggests policymakers should focus on linguistic minorities when supporting financial advisory services.

The researchers question whether robo-advisory services can adequately replace the social good provided by human advisers and found that technological solutions do not replicate the knowledge diffusion that occurs through social networks.

Community Vulnerability Factors

Further analysis revealed essential insights about community characteristics that influence fraud susceptibility. The researchers found:

1. Community trust levels: Areas with higher social trust experienced significantly fewer fraud incidents, highlighting trust as a protective factor against financial misconduct.
2. Linguistic diversity: Communities with higher percentages of non-English speakers showed increased vulnerability to financial fraud and registered more complaints to AFCA related to fraud, suggesting language barriers may impede financial literacy.
3. Religious composition: The percentage of residents identifying as Christian within an LGA appeared relevant, potentially reflecting community social networks and trust dynamics.
4. Bank branch attrition: The researchers examined whether the withdrawal of bank branches from areas might correlate with increased fraud as residents become more reliant on digital financial services.

These findings emphasise the complex interplay between adviser presence, community characteristics, and fraud susceptibility, suggesting targeted approaches may be needed to protect vulnerable communities.

Balancing Reform with Access

As the financial advice profession continues to evolve, this research highlights the need to balance professionalising the industry with adequate access to quality financial advice. The study provides empirical evidence that financial advisers serve as "unsung guardians" of their communities, with benefits extending well beyond their direct clientele.

These findings underscore the significant social value advisers provide, mainly through professional ethics training that enhances their ability to protect communities from financial misconduct.

Future Research Directions

The authors identify several avenues for future research, including:

1. Determining whether the increased fraud is sustained, diminishes, or escalates over time following adviser attrition
2. Investigating the specific mechanisms through which adviser knowledge spreads within communities
3. Examining whether different educational thresholds (such as bachelor's degree vs. other qualifications) produce different community outcomes
4. Conducting comparative analyses across different countries and regulatory environments

Conclusion: The Value of Financial Advisers as Community Assets

This pioneering study illuminates a previously under-recognised dimension of the financial advice profession: advisers' role as protective influences against fraud within their broader communities. As regulatory frameworks continue to evolve, policymakers must consider the direct impacts on clients and these wider societal benefits, particularly the ability of professional advisers to support larger client bases through a professional regulatory framework.

"This study therefore attempts to illustrate the prevailing status quo, with adviser attrition being seen as a cost to the potential regeneration of a professionalised and dedicated workforce," the authors conclude. "Nevertheless, advisers are shown to safeguard their surrounding communities from fraudulent products and schemes, thus advocating for the characterisation as 'unsung guardians.'"

While the profession has turned a corner on ongoing attrition and awaits much-needed regulatory changes, this research provides timely evidence of financial advisers' broader social value, suggesting that access to quality advice may be as crucial as adviser qualification standards in protecting communities from financial harm.

Article by:

Adviser Ratings

Was this helpful content?Let others know - share and vote-up