By Angus Woods
For the past 12 months, The Australian Financial Review (AFR) has been bashing a panicked CPA over the role of their recently terminated CEO, Alex Malley, and more generally, the way the Board has run one of Australia’s oldest and respected associations.
As a CPA member, I find some of the reading particularly disturbing. Given the “professional readership” of the AFR, there is opportunity that advisers could paradoxically be seen in a better light than accountants. And I say paradoxically given the beating the advice industry has had in recent years.
Alex Malley recently received a $4.9M termination payout upon leaving CPA Australia
Adviser Ratings has had some concerned subscribers emailing us about the CPA of late. Does any of this mean that advised consumers should be avoiding accountants, or CPAs for that matter when seeking advice? Simply put, no. Whilst governance in any organisation can permeate through to its employees or its members, a culture is more often ingrained over many years and there is rightly some dissociation when it comes to a member v an employee. Notwithstanding, it is important that if seeking advice from an accountant they do have the appropriate training and background knowledge to give that advice. Whilst the accounting profession has been held in relatively high regard over the years, the leniency towards accountants in giving advice through previous exemptions by the regulator, may mean that they are not as versed in advice matters than pure financial advisers. However, this does little to suppress the potential regulatory concerns around CPA offering advice.
When receiving advice from an accountant we have been advising subscribers that they should make sure they are appropriately licensed. Whilst CPA now have their own advice license, many accountants are also authorized representatives under other licensees.
The battleground for the accountant
With advisers requiring at least a limited AFSL to give advice, many organisations are cognisant of the knowledge many accountants have around SMSFs and superannuation. In twelve months, advisers numbers have actually grown 10% from 23k to 25k, with more than 50% of this increase driven by the accounting profession.
Top 10 organisations providing advice in Australia
Many accountants will be authorised under the SMSF Adviser Network, a license setup by the National Tax and Accountants Association (NTAA) to provide basic advice. Ironically, CPA have 25 CPA accountants operating under its license, whereas the NTAA have 304 CPA accountants (of a total 738 advisers), earning the licensee at least $76,000 per month in fees from CPA accountants. It will be interesting to see if the reduced pricing now offered by the CPA will see an expansion in their adviser numbers or if the recent media coverage will scare off any accountants looking to the CPA for this solution.
With accountants now facing renewed pressure on both compliance and their ability to administer advice beyond the basics, ASIC may be faced with another barrage of advice not being delivered in clients' best interests. The "profession label" under which accountants operate will be appropriately tested given the varying remuneration opportunities that exist in financial planning.
Article by:
Comments7
"HOW CAN ANYONE GIVE INVESTMENT ADVICE WITHOUT CONSIDERING REAL ESTATE."
G B WILKINSON 10:36 on 29 Jun 17
"I think the restricted SMSF license is the most interesting here - how do you meet the legal definition of Best Interests when nearly 100% of recommendations will be to set up and SMSF ? ASIC is most on alert for 'same advice fits all' models, but surely the restricted license ensures that outcome. It requires a high degree of ethical behaviour by the practitioner, so it will be interesting to see - I'm backing animal spirits to win and further blow ups as a result. "
Phil 07:56 on 29 Jun 17
"CPA continuing to persist with its own license is a bit like putting the fox in charge of the hen house- vested interests will prevail and there will be more than ruffled feathers at the end. There are many excellent, non conflicted licensees accountants can choose from and I would encourage the remaining CPA Advice reps to seek them out."
Frances Hesse 15:33 on 28 Jun 17
"The "profession label" under which accountants operate was appropriately tested when 3000 investors were "introduced" to a private equity firm raising funds for the failed Guvera IPO. A little it of knowledge is a dangerous thing. $181m down the drain mostly from accountant's clients with no protection as the accountants signed off on sophisticated investor certificates"
Che Guvera 15:31 on 28 Jun 17
"We have a corporate authorised rep arrangement with an external licensee to provide financial advice - CPA are now giving us additional compliance requirements for any financial planning advice being provided from a completely external licensee, simply due to being a CPA accounting member. If they are not the ones issuing our financial advice license, they shouldnt be able to dictate additional compliance responsibilities on top of the already over regulated financial planning industry. What a joke"
Greg 15:15 on 28 Jun 17
"Malleys appointment stuck from the start. Like Paris Hilton, he's famous and well paid for doing nothing but increasing his own Brand awareness, but instead of using daddy's money, he's using CPA members. More grief here - http://www.afr.com/brand/rear-window/cpa-deletes-alex-malley-but-members-demand-answers-on-pay-20170627-gwzn7u"
Mates Rates 15:07 on 28 Jun 17
"I'm a long standing CPA and this whole saga has been disgraceful. I will be joining a licensee in the next few days and I can categorically say it won't be CPA"
David James 12:33 on 28 Jun 17